<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Navy Sinking the U.S. Space Program?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/05/15/is-the-navy-sinking-the-us-space-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/05/15/is-the-navy-sinking-the-us-space-program/</link>
	<description>TECHNOLOGY BOOMS AND HUMAN EXPANSION INTO THE COSMOS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zorn</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/05/15/is-the-navy-sinking-the-us-space-program/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/05/15/is-the-navy-sinking-the-us-space-program/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>One shuttle flight carries 6 - 8 astronauts.  With 2 or 3 flights a year - and the shuttle retiring - that would leave about about 900 well-trained but unemployable astronaut-qualified people.

The Navy is acting rationally, and the need for combat officers is not the main concern.  In terms of the astronaut corps, 900 is a huge number, but in terms of the officer corps, not so big.

Long-range planning is not the forte of those in government (or in NASA, it seems), but if we don&#039;t plan for the future, we plan to fail (according to some old proverb).

On the other hand, how long did it take for us to get from the V-2 to the Moon?  Did we do that without long-range planning?  (That was the program that gave rise to the cultural saying, &quot;They can put a man on the Moon, so why can&#039;t they do ......?&quot;.)

There&#039;s a need for long-range thinkers, Big Picture thinkers, and this may be the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One shuttle flight carries 6 &#8211; 8 astronauts.  With 2 or 3 flights a year &#8211; and the shuttle retiring &#8211; that would leave about about 900 well-trained but unemployable astronaut-qualified people.</p>
<p>The Navy is acting rationally, and the need for combat officers is not the main concern.  In terms of the astronaut corps, 900 is a huge number, but in terms of the officer corps, not so big.</p>
<p>Long-range planning is not the forte of those in government (or in NASA, it seems), but if we don&#8217;t plan for the future, we plan to fail (according to some old proverb).</p>
<p>On the other hand, how long did it take for us to get from the V-2 to the Moon?  Did we do that without long-range planning?  (That was the program that gave rise to the cultural saying, &#8220;They can put a man on the Moon, so why can&#8217;t they do &#8230;&#8230;?&#8221;.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a need for long-range thinkers, Big Picture thinkers, and this may be the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

