<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Warp 10, Scotty!&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/</link>
	<description>TECHNOLOGY BOOMS AND HUMAN EXPANSION INTO THE COSMOS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Thornton</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/comment-page-1/#comment-32192</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/#comment-32192</guid>
		<description>---- Snip ---

- -  About 100 to nearly 200 years out: Nuclear Fusion (not fission) can yield speeds of up to 5% and possibly 10 % of light, using micro fusion explosions and the famed Buzzard Fusion Ramjet. . .  Fusion generators could power an ion engine also. This technology is the first to make a “barely” viable 80 to 100 year round trip to the nearest star outside our solar system possible.  

- - Around 150 + to 250 + years out:  Matter-Antimatter with a multi Terawatt laser-ion output using a light sail or similar could make a 10 to 20 year round trip to the nearest star (Proxima-Alpha Centari) possible… viable, still not desirable... though way better than some multi - generational approach with older tech, which would be stupid to try unless Earth faced a life ending disaster. 

These are still sub light speed technologies. 
 
Warp drive is WAY more advanced than anything described above. It involves NOT just anti-matter, but manipulating gravity using negative or zero point energy. Or achieving something called PLANK energy levels...

---Snip ---


&lt;strong&gt;Hi Bill,

Although I enjoyed your comment and your timescales may be right, it&#039;s really impossible to extrapolate advanced concepts or technologies much beyond 100 years.  

Think about Moore&#039;s Law ...

Bruce&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;- Snip &#8212;</p>
<p>- &#8211;  About 100 to nearly 200 years out: Nuclear Fusion (not fission) can yield speeds of up to 5% and possibly 10 % of light, using micro fusion explosions and the famed Buzzard Fusion Ramjet. . .  Fusion generators could power an ion engine also. This technology is the first to make a “barely” viable 80 to 100 year round trip to the nearest star outside our solar system possible.  </p>
<p>- &#8211; Around 150 + to 250 + years out:  Matter-Antimatter with a multi Terawatt laser-ion output using a light sail or similar could make a 10 to 20 year round trip to the nearest star (Proxima-Alpha Centari) possible… viable, still not desirable&#8230; though way better than some multi &#8211; generational approach with older tech, which would be stupid to try unless Earth faced a life ending disaster. </p>
<p>These are still sub light speed technologies. </p>
<p>Warp drive is WAY more advanced than anything described above. It involves NOT just anti-matter, but manipulating gravity using negative or zero point energy. Or achieving something called PLANK energy levels&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;Snip &#8212;</p>
<p><strong>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>Although I enjoyed your comment and your timescales may be right, it&#8217;s really impossible to extrapolate advanced concepts or technologies much beyond 100 years.  </p>
<p>Think about Moore&#8217;s Law &#8230;</p>
<p>Bruce</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonus</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/comment-page-1/#comment-9101</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/#comment-9101</guid>
		<description>For a more feasible warp drive that may become reality in 10 to 20 years, see
Hotmail:Real life warp drive science.

&lt;strong&gt;Hi Martin,

&quot;10 to 20 years&quot;...?  Wow, you are an optimist!

Best regards...
Bruce&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a more feasible warp drive that may become reality in 10 to 20 years, see<br />
Hotmail:Real life warp drive science.</p>
<p><strong>Hi Martin,</p>
<p>&#8220;10 to 20 years&#8221;&#8230;?  Wow, you are an optimist!</p>
<p>Best regards&#8230;<br />
Bruce</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Metcalf</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Metcalf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/10/11/warp-10-scotty/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see the JBIS publishing these types of theoretical articles.  I expect more of this kind of thing in the future, thanks to the formation of the Tau Zero Foundation (http://www.tauzero.aero).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see the JBIS publishing these types of theoretical articles.  I expect more of this kind of thing in the future, thanks to the formation of the Tau Zero Foundation (<a href="http://www.tauzero.aero" rel="nofollow">http://www.tauzero.aero</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

