<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Human Spaceflight &#8230; The MIT View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/</link>
	<description>TECHNOLOGY BOOMS AND HUMAN EXPANSION INTO THE COSMOS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crudely Wrott</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Crudely Wrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>No innate, universal compulsion to explore?

Ahh. That explains why we don&#039;t have to keep an eye on our children as they grow up; they&#039;re not curious about anything after all.

I recall James van Allen describing the similarity between trees, hills, mountains, balloons, airplanes and rockets. They are all things that we have used to get a better view, to see what&#039;s over there and to locate ourselves on the map. The chief result of such inspection is . . . a bigger map!

No, we don&#039;t desire to overthrow tired philosophies of manufactured contentment (OK, &quot;some&quot; do) and we never tire of a bland and unchanging life. No, not at all.

Remember this the next time you look up at a clear night sky. Especially if you have a child in tow. Wouldn&#039;t want to awake intellect by feeding young curiosity since we all know it just causes change and, uh, progress.

Who needs all that stuff?

&lt;strong&gt;I agree.

It&#039;s odd for a group of first-rate MIT engineers to offer such an obvious strawman statement attempting to disavow the human fascination with exploration.

Happy New Year...&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No innate, universal compulsion to explore?</p>
<p>Ahh. That explains why we don&#8217;t have to keep an eye on our children as they grow up; they&#8217;re not curious about anything after all.</p>
<p>I recall James van Allen describing the similarity between trees, hills, mountains, balloons, airplanes and rockets. They are all things that we have used to get a better view, to see what&#8217;s over there and to locate ourselves on the map. The chief result of such inspection is . . . a bigger map!</p>
<p>No, we don&#8217;t desire to overthrow tired philosophies of manufactured contentment (OK, &#8220;some&#8221; do) and we never tire of a bland and unchanging life. No, not at all.</p>
<p>Remember this the next time you look up at a clear night sky. Especially if you have a child in tow. Wouldn&#8217;t want to awake intellect by feeding young curiosity since we all know it just causes change and, uh, progress.</p>
<p>Who needs all that stuff?</p>
<p><strong>I agree.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s odd for a group of first-rate MIT engineers to offer such an obvious strawman statement attempting to disavow the human fascination with exploration.</p>
<p>Happy New Year&#8230;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burst</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Burst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/12/21/the-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-mit-view/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Scientists tend to stay away from &quot;emotional&quot; things, so that might have been the base for the claim that offended you. Great summary of the article though. I really love your blog and look forward to the posts. Thank you..

&lt;strong&gt;Thanks.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists tend to stay away from &#8220;emotional&#8221; things, so that might have been the base for the claim that offended you. Great summary of the article though. I really love your blog and look forward to the posts. Thank you..</p>
<p><strong>Thanks.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
