<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was the 1960s Apollo Moon program an &quot;anomaly&quot;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://21stcenturywaves.com/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/</link>
	<description>TECHNOLOGY BOOMS AND HUMAN EXPANSION INTO THE COSMOS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>The mention of asteroids with earthbound vectors has always sent chills down my spine since I saw the movie &lt;em&gt;Armageddon&lt;/em&gt;. While I know the plot is very unbelievable and has many holes and errors I do think there needs to be some sort of semblance of an idea as to what needs to be done should earth be hit by an asteroid. Take a look at this chilling video about what would happen if earth got hit by one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/27/watch-if-an-asteroid-hit_n_153724.html

Jack

&lt;strong&gt;Thanks Jack.
As Charleton Heston says at the beginning of Bruce Willis&#039; movie, &quot;It&#039;s happened before, and it will happen again.&quot;
Bruce&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mention of asteroids with earthbound vectors has always sent chills down my spine since I saw the movie <em>Armageddon</em>. While I know the plot is very unbelievable and has many holes and errors I do think there needs to be some sort of semblance of an idea as to what needs to be done should earth be hit by an asteroid. Take a look at this chilling video about what would happen if earth got hit by one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/27/watch-if-an-asteroid-hit_n_153724.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/27/watch-if-an-asteroid-hit_n_153724.html</a></p>
<p>Jack</p>
<p><strong>Thanks Jack.<br />
As Charleton Heston says at the beginning of Bruce Willis&#8217; movie, &#8220;It&#8217;s happened before, and it will happen again.&#8221;<br />
Bruce</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I think, if we can come through the problems we have now (like our over-reliance on fossil fuels), then we&#039;ll have a chance of making meaningful progress in space sometime in the next century or so.  It definitely won&#039;t be 2020.

&lt;strong&gt;Hi Chris,

Thanks for your comment.  Thanks also for your skepticism. In a world like this where so many in positions of authority are so confused about reality, skepticism is a very healthy response.

Also, there&#039;s only one thing we can say &quot;definitely&quot; about the future: It definitely cannot be predicted with certainty!

That&#039;s why I use a technique based on 200+ years of global economic, technology, and political trends. When you see patterns popping up repeatedly over 2+ centuries you have to be impressed.  The media and most commentators have us so saturated with ultra-short term thinking that it&#039;s hard for most to identify with a long-term perspective -- that&#039;s one reason 21stCenturyWaves.com was created.

But I think you&#039;ve got it a little backwards, we aren&#039;t waiting to solve all our problems on Earth before we go into space; that&#039;s like waiting until we get well before we go to the doctor! :)

In reality, we&#039;re going into space to help solve our problems on Earth !!  A very important point. Energy is a perfect example of how this will work.

It&#039;s 2009. By 2025 -- within 16 years or so of right now, based on the Maslow WIndows on the past 200 years -- we should have international bases on the Moon, space power satellites near Earth, and maybe the first folks on Mars.  But saying this is like time-traveling back to 1953 and walking up to someone and saying, &quot;Do you realize that in 16 years or so the first men will land on the Moon?&quot;  But of course it happened! And it&#039;s getting ready to happen again for the same economic and psychological reasons it did before.

That&#039;s why this website exists: To show how how these brief, but magnificent Maslow Windows originate and how they enable unprecendented exploration and technology programs that transform the world. And that it&#039;s starting again, right now!  Even our current global recession is a typical part of this picture; please check my archived posts on this topic.

Keep thinking and reading...best regards,
Bruce&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, if we can come through the problems we have now (like our over-reliance on fossil fuels), then we&#8217;ll have a chance of making meaningful progress in space sometime in the next century or so.  It definitely won&#8217;t be 2020.</p>
<p><strong>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  Thanks also for your skepticism. In a world like this where so many in positions of authority are so confused about reality, skepticism is a very healthy response.</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s only one thing we can say &#8220;definitely&#8221; about the future: It definitely cannot be predicted with certainty!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I use a technique based on 200+ years of global economic, technology, and political trends. When you see patterns popping up repeatedly over 2+ centuries you have to be impressed.  The media and most commentators have us so saturated with ultra-short term thinking that it&#8217;s hard for most to identify with a long-term perspective &#8212; that&#8217;s one reason 21stCenturyWaves.com was created.</p>
<p>But I think you&#8217;ve got it a little backwards, we aren&#8217;t waiting to solve all our problems on Earth before we go into space; that&#8217;s like waiting until we get well before we go to the doctor! <img src='http://21stcenturywaves.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In reality, we&#8217;re going into space to help solve our problems on Earth !!  A very important point. Energy is a perfect example of how this will work.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 2009. By 2025 &#8212; within 16 years or so of right now, based on the Maslow WIndows on the past 200 years &#8212; we should have international bases on the Moon, space power satellites near Earth, and maybe the first folks on Mars.  But saying this is like time-traveling back to 1953 and walking up to someone and saying, &#8220;Do you realize that in 16 years or so the first men will land on the Moon?&#8221;  But of course it happened! And it&#8217;s getting ready to happen again for the same economic and psychological reasons it did before.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why this website exists: To show how how these brief, but magnificent Maslow Windows originate and how they enable unprecendented exploration and technology programs that transform the world. And that it&#8217;s starting again, right now!  Even our current global recession is a typical part of this picture; please check my archived posts on this topic.</p>
<p>Keep thinking and reading&#8230;best regards,<br />
Bruce</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciencia Kanija » ¿Fue el programa luna Apolo en la década de 1960 una “anomalía”?</title>
		<link>http://21stcenturywaves.com/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciencia Kanija » ¿Fue el programa luna Apolo en la década de 1960 una “anomalía”?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2009/02/03/was-the-1960s-apollo-moon-program-an-anomaly/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] Bruce Cordell Fecha Original: 3 de febrero de 2009 Enlace Original Articulos RelacionadosLa misión lunar SELENE observa el lugar de aterrizaje de Apolo XVEncontrada [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bruce Cordell Fecha Original: 3 de febrero de 2009 Enlace Original Articulos RelacionadosLa misión lunar SELENE observa el lugar de aterrizaje de Apolo XVEncontrada [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
