21st Century Waves TECHNOLOGY BOOMS AND HUMAN EXPANSION INTO THE COSMOS 2008-12-01T03:22:57Z WordPress http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/feed/atom/ Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[Readers’ Favorite Posts — November]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/12/01/readers-favorite-posts-november/ 2008-12-01T03:20:44Z 2008-12-01T03:18:02Z This is a list of our readers’ favorite posts for November, 2008, based on the number of times each post was visited during November.

For current lists of readers’ favorite posts for all previous months please click HERE.
For updated lists of readers’ favorite posts for the last 7 days and for all-time, please click HERE.

The list below includes both Daily Wavelet posts and the State of the Wave posts.

This list gives only the top 5 favorites in order of reader preference. All posts below are clickable and their publishing dates are given.

NOVEMBER, 2008 — Readers’ Favorites

1) 10 Lessons Lewis & Clark Teach Us About the Human Future in Space — 8/17/08
2) Forecasting the Next 20 Years in Space — State of the Wave, Friday 9/12/08 — 9/14/08
3) “A United, Global Effort for Long-Term Human Space Exploration?” — Why Not? — 11/08/08
4) State of the Wave, Geopolitical & Economic Focus — Monday 10/27/08 — 10/28/08
5) The New Cuban Space Center and Vladimir Bonaparte — 10/8/08

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[10 Lessons Peary & Amundsen Teach Us About the Human Future in Space]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/29/10-lessons-peary-amundsen-teach-us-about-the-human-future-in-space/ 2008-11-29T17:55:13Z 2008-11-29T02:26:26Z Riveting polar expeditions of the 1903 Maslow Window resulted in the discovery of the north pole by Adm. Robert Peary (U.S.) in 1909 and the south pole by Roald Amundsen (Norway) in 1911; this “pole mania” featured daring adventure, international competition, and tragic accidents. The Peary/Amundsen Maslow Window has intriguing parallels with the 1960s Apollo Moon program and many lessons for the future human exploration and settlement of the Moon and Mars.
The top 10 lessons of Peary and Amundsen include:

10. The early 20th Century Peary/Amundsen Maslow Window (1903 - 1913) featured the spectacular achievement of Admiral Robert Peary — first credited with reaching the north pole — and the “Heroic Age” of Antarctic exploration including Roald Amundsen, discoverer of the south pole, the tragic deaths of Robert Scott and his crew, and the aborted transantarctic expedition of Ernest Shackleton… For more, click HERE.
The presence of both widespread ebullience and spectacular exploration of new geographical sites forms the core of Maslow Windows of the last 200 Years, and will likely be the zeitgeist of the 2015 Maslow Window

Amundsen and crew reach the “last place on Earth” in December, 1911. Click southpole.jpg.

9. Antarctic exploration in 1843 by Sir James Clark Ross — discoverer of the well-known Ross Ice Shelf — was the last mid-19th Century foray into the Antarctic by explorers for more than 50 years. Polar expeditions were replaced by the central African adventures of Dr. David Livingstone as the focus of the world’s attention during his Great Exploration. The postponement of polar exploration until the early 20th Century is consistent with the general rules of thumb for Great Explorations (GEs) during the last 200 years: a) GEs are separated by 55 to 60 years, b) their sequence is from closer geographical sites to those of greater inaccessibility (e.g., central Africa vs. poles), and c) new GE sites always stimulate great public interest. And thus our next Maslow Window should arrive near 2015 and involve humans to Mars, Moon bases, or possibly both.

8. Clarence King — a 19th Century version of both Carl Sagan and Howard Hughes –was one of the greatest explorers of the American West, but because of poor long wave timing he’s not associated with a Great Exploration. During his important exploits, Americans were devastated by the Civil War and Europeans were distraught by the financial Panic of 1873… For more, click HERE.
Scentist-Explorer Clarence King is a classic example of a great explorer not having the global impact you’d expect because his discoveries occurred in the decades between Maslow Windows; these often dark decades — over the last 200 years — are inhabited by major wars and financial contractions that quickly destroy societal ebullience and make Great Explorations temporarily impossible.

7. “This is the greatest factor — the way in which the expedition is equipped — the way in which every difficulty is foreseen, and precautions taken for meeting or avoiding it. Victory awaits him who has everything in order — luck, people call it. Defeat is certain for him who has neglected to take the necessary precautions in time; this is called bad luck,” according to the discoverer of the south pole, Roald Amundsen. In the 15 major antarctic expeditions from 8 countries during the Heroic Age, there were a total of 17 crew deaths, including Scott’s entire party of 5 while returning from the pole. Having been overcome by extreme weather and questionable strategic decisions, Scott’s ill-fated crew is reminiscent of the famous California-bound Donner party during the ebullient mid-19th Century Maslow Window, who was trapped by unusual, early snow storms in the California mountains after ill-advised voluntary delays.
Great Explorations always involve significant risks, especially in an atmosphere of international competition. Experience has shown (see Stuster, 1996) that the best way to ensure crew safety and mission success is by trying to anticipate every potentially threatening situation and taking appropriate precautions.

Monument near Donner Lake indicating the 20+ foot depth of the snow in 1846 (B. Cordell, 1999). Click donner.pdf.

6. The international conquest of Antarctica was launched in 1895 when a general resolution at the 6th International Geographical Society in London exhorted scientific societies world-wide to support antarctic exploration. This echoed a similar theme ventilated by London’s Royal Geographical Society in 1893. Between 1901 and 1917 — the “Heroic Age” — 15 expeditions to Antarctica were mounted by 8 countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, Scotland, France, Japan, Norway, and Australia.
The Heroic Age of antarctic exploration proved that international cooperation can be a powerful tool for science and exploration, and suggests that it will be essential for human expansion into the cosmos.

5. The financial Panic of 1893 caused estimated unemployment over 10% for 5+ years. The crisis initially lasted only 18 months but was followed by another recession that continued into 1897. The combination of GDP declines of several % coupled with population growth meant that GDP per capita didn’t recover to 1892 levels until 1899… For more, click HERE.
The Panics of 1893 and 2008 have interesting parallels, including that they began 10 and 8 years before their Maslow Windows opened, respectively. The Panic of 1893 suggests that the 2015 Maslow Window might be delayed only briefly as the global economy recovers to its mid-2007 “greatest ever global boom” status.

The 2015 Maslow Window may still arrive on time and feature Great Explorations even greater than Peary & Amundsen and Apollo, and MEPs more amazing than even the Panama Canal. Click panama.jpg.

4. Unike the Lewis and Clark expedition, which opened the West to human settlers, the Heroic Age of Antarctic exploration did not trigger massive human migrations to the polar regions. And while important meteorological and geographical science was done, it was the sheer adventure of polar exploration that enthralled the world… For more, click HERE.
That’s why during the 1960s Maslow Window, President Kennedy did not propose sending a mission to exploit the polar areas or anywhere else on earth, he chose to go to the Moon. It was the next obvious target that would globally demonstrate America’s technological prowess (Apollo was also an MEP), as well as revitalize education and society by activating raw human exploration passions — that have been hard-wired into us for 200,000 years.

3. “To a visitor from Mars it must have seemed that the Western world in 1914 was on the brink of Utopia,” according to historians J. Harrison and R. Sullivan (1966). Unfortunately, this pinnacle of Polar Maslow Window ebullience crashed in 1914 with the onset of World War I, the “Great War.” For more, click HERE.
The Peary/Amundsen Maslow Window is consistent with the lesson of the last 200 years: public support for Great Explorations and Macro-Engineering Projects typically vaporizes shortly after the economic boom peaks due to financial, political, and/or military factors. Maslow Windows flourish for less than a decade, and — unless we make special plans for it — the 2015 Window is unlikely to be an exception.

2. Although antarctic exploration began with an international organization in the mid-1890s, the desire to be first to the pole — i.e., pole mania — was overwhelming to some explorers. When Amundsen realized that Peary had reached the north pole in 1909, he made secret plans to be first to the south pole. For more, click HERE.
The Amundsen-Scott pole mania episode is reminiscent of the 1950s Cold War, which featured the International Geophysical Year’s plans to launch satellites into Earth orbit and resulted in the surprise Soviet launch of Sputnik in 1957; Sputnik ignited the Race to Space as the Apollo Maslow Window opened. As we approach the 2015 Maslow Window, is an Amundsen/Sputnik-type surprise likely to trigger the Next Race to Space?

1. Will there be a Grand Alliance for Space? Although the Polar Maslow Window failed in that regard (See #2), it’s likely the technical and financial challenges of early 21st Century space colonization will require a globally coordinated approach. The last 200 years indicate that twice-per-century pulses of Great Explorations and Macro-Engineering Projects are likely to be the focus of global ebullience in the foreseeable future — especially in space. And AIAA’s Jerry Grey and others have even suggested a multi-decade plan for unified, global settlement of the solar system. The spectacular achievement of the $ 100 B International Space Station and current international plans for Moon exploration and bases suggest hopeful movement in the right direction.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[Happy Thanksgiving Everybody!]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/28/happy-thanksgiving-everybody/ 2008-11-28T04:42:18Z 2008-11-28T04:38:41Z Hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving holiday!

21stCenturyWaves.com is again happily participating in the Carnival of Space (#81), this week hosted by Tiny Mantras. If you’d like to sample a number of excellent space-related weblogs, please click HERE.

The Carnival is run by Fraser Cain, publisher of Universe Today.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[National Intelligence Council Report Supports Maslow Window Forecasts]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/23/national-intelligence-council-report-supports-maslow-window-forecasts/ 2008-11-24T13:53:39Z 2008-11-23T06:59:11Z Last week the National Intelligence Council (NIC) released its most recent unclassified global briefing, Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World that closely parallels forecasts of this weblog. 21stCenturyWaves.com forecasts are based on patterns in long-term trends in the economy, technology, exploration, and society over the last 200 years, that include spectacular pulses of Great Explorations and Macro-Engineering Projects (MEPs) known as Maslow Windows.

NIC provides long-term strategic thinking for the U.S. Intelligence Community and reports to the Director of National Intelligence. It has a Deputy National Intelligence Officer for each of 12 areas and subject matters, including East Asia, Europe, Russia and Eurasia, Economics and Global Issues, and Military Issues, etc., and consults with experts in academia and the private sector.

Global Trends 2025’s preliminary assessments for the next 15 years include:

1) We should expect “unprecedented economic growth.” This NIC assessment is completely consistent with this weblog’s economic forecasts that include rhythmic, twice-per-century major economic booms; the next one should culminate around 2025. This “unprecedented economic growth” is essential for the affluence and ebullience that’s driven the spectacular Great Explorations and MEPs of Maslow Windows over the last 200 years.

2) “The whole international system — as constructed following WW II — will be revolutionized.” There will be “new players — Brazil, Russia, India, China — …at the international high table…bringing new stakes and rules…” This NIC expectation is consistent with the history of exploration over the last 200 years and supports our forecast that NASA will become more globally oriented. More specifically it supports our 1992 concept for a truly global space organization (like Interspace) that could take shape in 4-6 years to optimally focus global assets on human exploration of the solar system.

3) “The potential for conflict will increase…and the unprecedented transfer of wealth roughly from West to East …will continue…” Sadly, the last 200 years show that every Maslow Window of the last 200 years is terminated by a major war; this NIC assessment is consistent with our forecast of another major war in the mid-2020s. If this war comes early (e.g., 2020), in addition to widespread death and destruction, we could lose many or most of the Great Explorations and MEPs anticipated for the next Maslow Window. The timing of the major 2020s war remains a total wildcard of crucial importance.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[The Moon is Not Enough…!]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/22/the-moon-is-not-enough/ 2008-11-23T00:38:01Z 2008-11-22T23:31:38Z Like James Bond, who believed that “The World is Not Enough!”, The Planetary Society thinks the Moon is not enough…and frankly I agree with them!

The World is not enough… Click apollo08_earthrise.jpg.

I’ve always liked Lou Friedman and The Planetary Society! Explore the planets, humans to Mars, an international team — what’s not to like? It’s practically the meaning of life! I also enjoyed their new roadmap to the solar system: Beyond the Moon: A New Roadmap for Human Space Exploration in the 21st Century. And the title of their plan says it all: the Moon is not enough. They have clear differences with NASA’s current Vision for Space Exploration.

The Moon is not enough… Click full_moon_small.jpg.

There are now three fundamental visions for space: 1) NASA’s current Moon-focused Vision for Space Exploration, (VSE) 2) The Planetary Society’s roadmap featuring Mars, and 3) a vision with interstellar travel to the nearby stars as its focus. Vision 3 has been championed by the British Interplanetary Society since its 1970s Project Daedalus study, as well as by Gene Roddenberry. More recently it has resurfaced as a way to promote a multidecade, global commitment to human space exploration; in essence they believe that Mars is not enough.

Is Mars enough? Click mars.jpg.

The model of this weblog (e.g., Cordell, 2006, and “Forecasting...”) has met with considerable success in explaining great explorations and technology development over the last 200 years in the context of long-term fluctuations in the economy. For example, a) this model explains why Apollo began when it did and why it ended abruptly (as well as all the other Great Explorations over the last 200 years), b) the model pointed to a financial panic near 2008 and Obama’s likely election (although I failed to explicitly forecast them!), and 3) the model projects what we currently observe — increasing global interest in space as we approach another ebullient 1960s-like decade: the 2015 Maslow Window.

So in the context of this long-term economic model, I want to offer a few comments on the Planetary Society’s roadmap:

1. The program focus — Moon, Mars, interstellar — really matters from a marketing perspective. The Moon suffers from the fact that humans went there 6 times almost 40 years ago. This might encourage a “been there, done that” attitude. Or will the global public see human exploration of the Moon like past generations viewed terrestrial Great Explorations; i.e., progressing from more accessible locations like northwest North America (Lewis & Clark) to more distant ones like central Africa (”Dr. Livingstone I presume”) and both polar regions (early 20th Century)? However, if the global public views the Moon as just one more stop on the road to Mars and beyond, the sequence of Great Explorations over the last 200 years — North America, central Africa, Polar regions, Moon — suggests that Mars makes a more alluring program focus — from a marketing perspective — than the Moon.

2. Global momentum is currently toward the Moon. The U.S., with its International Lunar Network, as well as many other countries (including China, Japan) have expressed strong interests in Moon bases circa 2020. Authoritative sources (e.g., National Intelligence Council) forecast a “revolutionized” international system toward 2025 (during the 2015 Maslow Window) including new players at the high table (e.g., Brazil, India) and new rules. This will enhance U.S. plans for expanding ISS-style coorperation to the Moon and beyond, and may even make a truly global approach to space (such as Interspace) possible. This trend, plus the closeness and easy access of the Moon, may make a Mars focus — even in the 2020s — less attractive to the global public.

3. Astronaut safety will drive any deep space program strategy.
Current NASA boss Mike Griffin contends that safety requires a Mars program to go through ISS and the Moon in logical steps, much like the Apollo program carefully approached the Moon. The Planetary Society report deemphasizes lunar surface infrastructure in favor of near-term human exploration of near-Earth asteroids. Although not mentioned in their report, developing human space ops experience at near-Earth asteroids will be extremely valuable at Mars when establishing human bases on Phobos and Deimos. The Planetary Society Mars-focus strategy elegantly integrates the first human missions beyond the Earth-Moon system with planetary defense (from near-Earth asteroid impacts), and with specific preparations for future human operations in the Mars system.

4. For a multidecade, global space vision to be viable, it must include a realistic geopolitical and economic framework provided by long-term trends over the last 200 years. The Planetary Society roadmap asserts that the NASA VSE goal of a human return to the Moon by 2020 may “lead to multi-decade delays in expansion of human activity beyond the Earth-Moon system.” They are absolutely right as I pointed out previously, although it’s not fundamentally because of programmatic and funding conflicts. They are more on target here: “The national economic situation exacerbates NASA’s budget difficulties and makes it likely that the stated lunar exploration timetable cannot be met.” In fact, the national (and global) economic situation is a predictable consequence of technological, exploration, and military trends that have persisted over at least the last 200 years. Ignorance of them results in disappointments like the abrupt end of the spectacular Apollo program. However, in reality, they provide a dependable framework within which multi-decade programs of any kind (including space) can be structured so they flourish and enable human expansion into the cosmos.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[21st Century Waves on the Web — A Recent Sample, 11/20/08]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/20/21st-century-waves-on-the-web-a-recent-sample-112008/ 2008-11-20T07:48:21Z 2008-11-20T07:48:21Z This is a recent sample of the intriguing ways 21stCenturyWaves.com is being portrayed on the web. Apologies if I couldn’t mention you this time.

Thanks to everyone who’s visited 21stCenturyWaves.com.

Colonizing Mars Project — Key Largo School, Key Largo, FL
Great Mars colonization site! Thanks for linking to: A New NASA for Colonization of Mars and the Moon

Alien Worlds Mag.com
Thanks to Stuart Miller for featuring my post:
How We Could Spot Nearby Space Aliens

One Astronomer’s Noise
“The case for an international effort to move humanity into space is made at 21st Century Waves, including quotes from Jerry Grey at the recent International Astronautical Congress. This may be the best way to take advantage of economic and cultural booms and move further into space as one, united humankind.”
Thanks to Nicole for featuring: “A United, Global Effort for Long-Term Human Space Exploration?” — Why Not?

Res Communis, University of Mississippi School of Law
Thanks to PJ Blount for featuring: “A United, Global Effort for Long-Term Human Space Exploration?” — Why Not?

The Abstracted Engineer
Although I’m not an isolationist (!), thanks for featuring: U.S. Losing “Dominance” in Space?

Free Economy Blogs.com
Thanks for featuring:
State of the Wave, Geopolitical & Economic Focus — Monday 10/27/08

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[How We Could Spot Nearby Space Aliens]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/18/how-we-could-spot-nearby-space-aliens/ 2008-11-19T00:26:34Z 2008-11-18T07:51:55Z “The prime exploratory challenge of the next fifty years is…surely to seek firm evidence for, or against, the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence,” according to Martin Rees, professor of cosmology and astrophysics at Cambridge University and Astronomer Royal; (see The Next Fifty Years, John Brockman, Ed., 2002).

Finding extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) would be a compelling long-term goal for humanity in the spirit of Bob Scaringe, who recently suggested interstellar travel (IT) to nearby stars as a way of ensuring human survival as well as motivating a multicentury, global space program. Indeed, the dynamic ETI/IT duo could stimulate a grandiose, long-term program which might even be launched during the next Maslow Window when ebullient extraterrestrial passions are likely to be high.

As of November 14, 2008 The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia lists 326 planets — mostly “hot Jupiters” — that have been discovered orbiting other stars. Current optimistic estimates are that the fraction of stars with planetary systems is between 30% and 50%, implying that there could be 50+ billion planetary systems in our Galaxy.

On Earth, humans appeared only about 200,000 years ago suggesting that billions of years might be required for ETI to appear on another planet. Because the Sun’s H-burning Main Sequence (MS) lifetime is 10 billion years, the ratio of humans’ emergence time to the Sun’s MS lifetime is about 0.5. Brandon Carter has suggested that this ratio for ETI will probably be close to 1 (did humans appear “early”?), and that ETI is unlikely in very young planetary systems.

A Dyson Sphere would prove the existence of ETI. Click dyson1.jpg.

In a provocative article in Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (February, 2008), scientist/author Martin Beech suggests that advanced civilizations near Sun-like stars would eventually engage in planetary engineering of any Mars- or Venus-like planets (e.g., Fogg, 1995) or even Dyson Spheres that could capture most of their star’s energy for use in lofty planetary-scale projects that might be detectable from Earth.

Using age estimates for 123 exoplanet-supporting stars (as of 2005), Beech plots the number of exoplanets vs. the ratio of star age to MS lifetime (a function of star mass); age ratios vary from 0 to 1.5 and the number of exoplanets for each age ratio varies from 1 to 18. Beech suggests that terraforming and Dyson sphere construction might begin as early as 0.4, interstellar migration could flourish from 0.9 to 1.1, and “sterilization” would engulf any planetary system from 1.1 onward as the star becomes a planet-killing red giant.

Beech lists 6 stars of particular interest known to be within 1% of their MS lifetime (i.e., age ratio very near 1). Although no Earth-like planets have been detected in any of these 6 ETI-optimal systems, 3 theoretically allow stable planetary orbits within their habitable zones; they are HD4308, HD190360, and 70 Virginis.

If habitable planets are discovered near these or similar stars, ebullient Earth-bound astronomers contemplating interstellar voyages will check their spectra, to see if “the lights are on” just in case any ETI’s are home.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[Readers’ Favorite Posts — 11/14/08]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/15/readers-favorite-posts-111408/ 2008-11-15T06:12:16Z 2008-11-15T06:12:16Z This is an updated biweekly list of our readers’ favorite posts, based on the number of times each post was visited during the times indicated below. The lists below include both Daily Wavelet posts and State of the Wave posts.

Timeframes of the readers’ lists below are: I) Favorites over the Last 7 Days, and II) All-Time Favorites (the first daily post was published on 5/11/08).

To see readers’ favorite posts for each previous month, click HERE.

The lists below give only the top 5 favorites in each category in order of reader preference.
Both lists are updated every other week on Friday afternoons.
All posts below are clickable and their publishing dates are given.

Updated 11/14/08

I. THE LAST 7 DAYS — Readers’ Favorites

1) “A United, Global Effort for Long-Term Human Space Exploration?” — Why Not? — 11/08/08
2) 10 Lessons Lewis & Clark Teach Us About the Human Future in Space — 8/17/08
3) Forecasting the Next 20 Years in Space — State of the Wave, Friday 9/12/08 — 9/14/08
4) India Takes AIm for the Moon! — 8/23/08
5) State of the Wave, Geopolitical and Economic Focus — Monday, 10/27/08 — 10/28/08

II. ALL-TIME — Readers’ Favorites

1) 10 Reasons Why China is Good for Space — 6/22/08
2) How Great Explorations Really Work — 7/10/08
3) Taikonaut to Take a Walk — 6/13/08
4) NASA’s Challenging Future..! — 8/1/08
5) Major Wars Threaten Future Space Initiatives — 7/12/08

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[What’s Even More Exciting Than Humans to Mars?]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/14/whats-even-more-exciting-than-humans-to-mars/ 2008-11-14T02:25:57Z 2008-11-14T01:36:58Z There is little doubt that proper use of modern marketing techniques would help NASA sell human spaceflight. Bob Scaringe, president of AVG Communications (Marietta, GA) quotes a 2007 poll (AIAA 2008-7872) indicating that, on the average, responders believed NASA received 24% of the federal budget, when in reality it got only 0.6%. This may be influencing the relatively large fraction (51%) of Americans who think we should cut NASA’s budget and the relatively small fraction (<10%) who actively support space exploration.

Should it be Mars?… Click mars_base.jpg.

What’s most interesting is Scaringe’s point that a truly compelling long-range goal will be needed to sustain the space program, and that Mars isn’t enough. He proposes targeting the estimated 10 Earth-like planets within 30 light years of Earth. “We should make interstellar travel a long-term aim…over the next 200 to 500 years.” This program would be “responsive to short-term ROI needs on Earth as well as…the long-term survival of the species.”

…Or the stars? Click galaxy.jpg.

This is multigenerational, Star Trek-style planning in the most inspirational sense of the word!

Scaringe, a marketing consultant, suggests that the decade-long 1960s Apollo program provides evidence that a new Kennedy-like president might be able to inspire the world to seriously consider our multigenerational Galactic aspirations — which paradoxically is sadly reminiscent of the political, economic, and military realities that have afflicted us in the past.

In fact, the Apollo experience suggests that more will be required than just mega-leadership. For example, the last 200 years show that Great Explorations and Macro-Engineering Projects (including Apollo) occur in short-lived, twice-per-century pulses (i.e., Maslow Windows), that are triggered by the momentary ebullience of major rhythmic economic booms, and terminated by major wars (e.g. W. W. I).

However, imagine the power of combining a multigenerational (or multicentury) vision for space such as Scaringe suggests with a realistic, multicentury understanding of long waves in the economy — going back 200 years — and how they influence technology development, global security, and human exploration.

This scientific and inspirational approach will eventually achieve humanity’s ultimate destiny: Interstellar colonization.

]]>
Dr. Bruce Cordell http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/about-us/ <![CDATA[State of the Wave, Politics Focus — Sunday 11/9/08]]> http://21stcenturywaves.com/blog/2008/11/10/state-of-the-wave-politics-focus-sunday-11908/ 2008-11-10T17:14:27Z 2008-11-10T07:45:42Z In a historic election, American voters have chosen Barack Obama as their President-Elect. So it’s of interest now to evaluate how our long wave forecast model held up and what this selection means for the human future in space, and especially the onset of the 2015 Maslow Window.

As stated previously, this weblog’s major interest was not to express personal preferences for any candidate, but to reasonably project the direction of the U.S. and global space programs and related activities.

Will President Obama lead the U.S. and the world into the next race to space, and open up the planetary worlds to all humankind? Click marsfuture.jpg.

21stCenturyWaves.com has shown that ebullient Great Explorations and Macro-Engineering Projects are associated with rhythmic, twice-per-century major economic booms, such as in the 1960s. The continuing global financial turmoil motivates our interest in this election, because without the return of the long global boom interrupted in 2007, there will be no Maslow Window and no 1960s-style space spectaculars.

The following points illustrate our forecast model’s robust character.

“There was only one issue — the economy,” according to close McCain advisor Sen. Lindsey Graham (Wall Street Journal, 11/7/08). With the economy as the presidential campaign’s focus, long-term economic influences initially made it reasonable to favor McCain over Obama; see Kennedy and Eisenhower.

However, three “wildcards” intervened:

1) During the Summer Olympics, the Russians attacked Georgia. This seemed to favor McCain given his war hero experiences.
2) The Panic of 2008 occurred and the Republicans took the blame. The Wall Street Journal headline (11/5/08) said it all, “As Economic Crisis Peaked, Tide Turned Against McCain.”
3) McCain was not an effective campaigner. For example, Wildcard 2 forced Sen. McCain to support Bush tax cuts that he’d previously voted against. Plus, McCain couldn’t seem to decide if Sen. Obama had lied about his relationship with Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers, or was “a decent person…that you do not have to be scared of,” (WSJ, 11/7/08).

As it turned out, Wildcards 2 and 3, trumped 1. But were these truly “wildcards”, or could they have been forecasted?

Although the exact timing of Wildcard 1 was not forecasted, this style of Russian aggression was not unexpected given the return of Cold War-like tensions in Europe — something that was likely in this timeframe based on long wave forecasts. Unfortunately, it can be expected to intensify.

Likewise for Wildcard 2 — although exact timings in market-related events are also difficult — a financial panic was also in the cards, based on the last 200 years of macroeconomic trends. Indeed, two of the last three Maslow Window openings featured major financial panics early in the decade just preceeding them: 1837 and 1893; only 1949 avoided one, see discussion HERE. With the Panic of 2008, the record is now 3 of the last 4 decades just prior to Maslow Windows were so afflicted.

Wildcard 3 was not predictable based on long wave trends, but Sen. McCain’s conflicted campaign style was obvious (New York Times Magazine, 10/26/08)

What of the future? The following points will be influential:

1. The Russians can be expected to continue to misbehave. Putin has already begun trying to intimidate Obama in the style of Biden’s campaign warning (10/19/08): “Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy… Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

2. The U.S. remains a “center - right” country politically, “and if Obama loses track of that, he’ll be a weak-ass Jimmy Carter in office, especially with all those Clinton-clones hanging around,” according to vehement Obama supporter and Democratic political strategist Thomas Barnett. Also, a revealing Rasmussen survey conducted October 2 found that 59% of all surveyed and 44% of Obama voters agreed with this: “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” (Wall Street Journal, 11/10/08).

3. The long-term trend of the economy is up, based on 200 years of macroeconomic data. This suggests that the current recession will be less like the Great Depression and more like the pre-Maslow Window panics in the 19th Century; both led to spectacular, on-time Maslow Windows.

4. Obama is flexible in his approach to problems and Obama’s key political asset is his Kennedy-like charisma. We’ve indicated before that Obama’s Kennedy-like persona suggests he could be the next Space President, but his long wave timing seemed a little premature. His main problem now is the duration of the current recession. The Los Angeles Times (11/9/08) reports that Obama backs public works projects in the style of Franklin Roosevelt as a way to combat a prolonged downturn.

If Obama can turn the recession around in his first term then he still has a chance to be The One to lead the world into the 2015 Maslow Window. Otherwise, he’ll be forced to leave it to his successor.

]]>